So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thiết kế Thử nghiệm Đối chứng Ngẫu nhiên theo Cụm× | Thử nghiệm kiểm soát ngẫu nhiên theo cụm× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thiết kế thí nghiệm | Thiết kế thí nghiệm |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1990s (formal methodology development) | 1978–1980s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Murray, D. M.; Donner, A. and Klar, N. (systematic formalization) | Cornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s) |
| Loại | Experimental design | Experimental design |
| Công trình gốc | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340691533 | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978 |
| Tên gọi khác | CRCT with control group, group-randomized trial, cluster RCT control group design, community randomized controlled trial | cluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | A cluster randomized control group experimental design randomly assigns intact groups (clusters) — such as schools, clinics, or communities — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions. At least one cluster group receives no active intervention, serving as the control. This design is essential when individual randomization is impractical or contamination between participants in close proximity is likely. | A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|