So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Citizen's Charter Evaluation× | New Public Management Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Public Administration | Public Administration |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời | 1991 | 1991 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | UK Citizen's Charter programme / OECD service-charter practice | Christopher Hood |
| Loại≠ | Evaluation framework | Analytical assessment framework |
| Công trình gốc≠ | OECD. Public governance, service delivery and citizen-centred public administration resources. OECD, Paris. link ↗ | Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | Service Charter Evaluation, Citizen Charter Assessment, Public Service Standards Evaluation, Service Commitment Review | NPM Assessment, Managerialism Assessment, Public Management Reform Analysis, Hood NPM Doctrine Analysis |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | A citizen's charter is a public statement of the service standards that citizens are entitled to expect from a public organisation — waiting times, response times, accuracy, courtesy and avenues of redress. Citizen's charter evaluation assesses whether an organisation actually meets the commitments it has published, by operationalising each standard, measuring real performance, and comparing performance against the promised threshold. Originating in the UK's 1991 Citizen's Charter programme and now embedded in OECD service-delivery and citizen-centred public-administration practice, charter evaluation turns service promises into accountable, measurable obligations. | New Public Management (NPM) assessment evaluates how far a public organisation or system has adopted the cluster of managerial reform doctrines that swept the public sector from the 1980s — and with what effects. Christopher Hood's 1991 article A Public Management for All Seasons? gave NPM its name and identified its core doctrines: hands-on professional management, explicit performance standards, output controls, disaggregation into units, competition, private-sector management styles, and discipline in resource use. The assessment scores adoption of these doctrines, evaluates their effects, and appraises the trade-offs against enduring public-service values such as equity and accountability. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|