ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích trích dẫn×Công cụ quản lý trích dẫn×Hệ thống định danh đối tượng số×
Lĩnh vựcKỹ năng nghiên cứuKỹ năng nghiên cứuKỹ năng nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1955 (citation indexes); 1975 (Impact Factor); 2005 (H-index)2001 (modern era, EndNoteWeb); 2006 (Mendeley); 2006 (Zotero)1998 (concept); 2001 (widespread adoption)
Người khởi xướngEugene Garfield (Citation Indexes, 1955); Jorge Hirsch (H-index, 2005)Academic researchers and librarians; developed since 1980sNorman Paskin, CrossRef and International DOI Foundation (1998)
LoạiToolToolStandard
Công trình gốcHirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. DOI ↗Booth, A. (2012). Citation management tools. In R. Bosch & K. Winn (Eds.), Reference management and citation software. Library Technology Reports, 48(5), 12–18. link ↗Paskin, N. (2010). Digital Object Identifier (DOI) system. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3rd ed., 1586–1592. ISBN: 978-0-8493-9712-7
Tên gọi kháccitation metrics, bibliometric analysis, citation trackingreference manager, citation software, bibliographic managementDOI, Digital Object Identifier, persistent identifier
Liên quan434
Tóm tắtCitation analysis is the systematic study of how scholarly works are cited by subsequent research, used as a proxy for research impact and influence. Founded formally by Eugene Garfield in 1955 (introducing citation indexes), the field encompasses metrics ranging from simple citation counts to sophisticated indices like the H-index (Hirsch, 2005) and field-normalized indicators. Citation analysis is used to evaluate researcher productivity, track influence of ideas, assess journal quality, and detect research trends. While citation counts are not perfect measures of quality (high citation does not equal high quality; time lag in citation accumulation), they provide valuable quantitative data for research evaluation alongside peer review and expert assessment.Citation management tools are software applications that store, organize, and format bibliographic references. They allow researchers to import citations from databases and websites, annotate and tag articles, organize references by project, and automatically generate formatted in-text citations and bibliographies in multiple styles (APA, Vancouver, Chicago, Harvard). Popular tools include Zotero (free, open-source), Mendeley (Elsevier-owned, freemium), EndNote (commercial, Clarivate), and others. These tools are essential for managing the hundreds to thousands of references accumulate during a research career and for ensuring consistent, accurate citation formatting in academic writing.A Digital Object Identifier (DOI) is a unique, persistent alphanumeric code that identifies a scholarly work (journal article, book chapter, dataset, preprint) and persists even if the URL changes. Introduced in 1998 by Norman Paskin and the International DOI Foundation, DOIs are now standard in academic publishing. They consist of a prefix (assigned to a publisher or organization) and a suffix (assigned to an individual work), formatted as 10.XXXX/XXXXX (e.g., 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097). DOIs are registered with international agencies (CrossRef, DataCite, mEDRA) and resolve through the centralized resolver https://doi.org/, ensuring that a DOI will direct users to the correct article regardless of whether the publisher's website changes location.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Citation Analysis · Citation Management Tools · Digital Object Identifier System. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-20 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare