So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Child-Rearing Authoritarianism Measure× | Authoritarian Dynamic Measurement× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Tâm lý học chính trị | Tâm lý học chính trị |
| Họ≠ | Latent structure | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1997 | 2005 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Stanley Feldman & Karen Stenner | Karen Stenner & Stanley Feldman |
| Loại≠ | Indirect dispositional measure of authoritarianism | Self-report predisposition measure |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741-770. DOI ↗ | Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521534789 |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | Child-Rearing Values Authoritarianism Scale, Feldman-Stenner Authoritarianism Items, Parenting-Values Authoritarianism Measure, Four-Item Child-Rearing Authoritarianism Battery | Child-Rearing Authoritarianism Scale, Stenner Authoritarianism Measure, Authoritarian Predisposition Scale |
| Liên quan≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The child-rearing values measure, introduced by Stanley Feldman and Karen Stenner in 1997, gauges an authoritarian predisposition indirectly by asking which qualities respondents most want to instill in children. Each item forces a choice between an autonomy-oriented quality (such as independence or curiosity) and a conformity-oriented quality (such as obedience or good manners). Because the questions never mention politics, the resulting four-item index measures a deep disposition toward order and sameness without contaminating it with the political attitudes it is meant to explain, avoiding the tautology that plagued earlier authoritarianism scales. | The authoritarian-dynamic approach, developed by Stenner (2005) and Feldman (2003), measures authoritarianism as a latent predisposition toward favoring social conformity and order over individual autonomy and difference, typically assessed with four forced-choice child-rearing values items rather than attitude statements. Its distinctive claim is that intolerance is a dynamic product of this predisposition interacting with perceived normative threat. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|