So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Danh mục Kiểm tra Thử nghiệm Ngẫu nhiên Có đối chứng của CASP× | GRADE Evidence Profiling× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận nghiên cứu | Phương pháp luận nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1993 (updated through 2023) | 2008 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) | Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group) |
| Loại≠ | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment | Research team / Guideline panel assessment |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ | Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | CASP-RCT, CASP | GRADE, GRADE approach |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. | GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|