So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích So sánh Phương pháp Bland-Altman× | Hệ số Kappa của Cohen× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thống kê | Thống kê |
| Họ | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1986 | 1960 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | J. Martin Bland & Douglas G. Altman | Jacob Cohen |
| Loại≠ | Graphical and statistical method comparison | Inter-rater reliability coefficient |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. DOI ↗ | Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | Bland-Altman plot, limits of agreement analysis, method agreement analysis, Bland-Altman Uyum Analizi | kappa coefficient, kappa statistic, Cohen's Kappa (Değerlendiriciler Arası Uyum) |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Bland-Altman analysis is a graphical and statistical technique for assessing agreement between two measurement methods applied to the same subjects. Introduced by J. Martin Bland and Douglas G. Altman in their landmark 1986 Lancet paper, it plots the difference between the two methods against their mean for each subject, and derives the bias (mean difference) along with limits of agreement (LoA) that capture 95% of differences in the population. | Cohen's kappa (κ) is a statistical measure of inter-rater reliability for categorical classifications, introduced by Jacob Cohen in 1960. Unlike simple percent agreement, kappa corrects for the level of agreement that would be expected purely by chance, making it the standard metric when two raters independently assign observations to the same set of mutually exclusive categories. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|