So sánh phương pháp

	AHP-BOCR	Quy trình Phân tích Thứ bậc	Lý thuyết Hữu dụng Đa Thuộc tính
Lĩnh vực	Ra quyết định	Ra quyết định	Ra quyết định
Họ	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Năm ra đời	2008	1980	1976
Người khởi xướng	Thomas L. Saaty (AHP); BOCR framework development extended AHP	Saaty, T. L.	Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H.
Loại	Hierarchical pairwise comparison with strategic perspective	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Additive multi-attribute utility function
Công trình gốc	Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4
Tên gọi khác	AHP-BOCR, Strategic Criteria AHP	—	—
Liên quan	5	8	8
Tóm tắt	AHP-BOCR is an extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process that incorporates strategic perspectives through the BOCR framework: Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Instead of optimizing a single objective, AHP-BOCR decomposes decisions into four strategic dimensions and uses a formula (Benefits × Opportunities) / (Costs × Risks) to synthesize a strategic priority. This approach is particularly suited to long-term, complex decisions with multiple stakeholder perspectives.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.