So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Quy trình Phân tích Thứ bậc× | Phương pháp Tốt nhất-Tệ nhất (Best-Worst Method)× | AHP mờ× | Lý thuyết Hữu dụng Đa Thuộc tính× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Ra quyết định | Ra quyết định | Ra quyết định | Ra quyết định |
| Họ | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1980 | 2015 | 1983 | 1976 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. | Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. | Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. |
| Loại≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP | Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-based | Additive multi-attribute utility function |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ | Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗ | Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4 |
| Tên gọi khác | — | — | — | — |
| Liên quan | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|
|
|