So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Advocacy Coalition Framework× | Multiple Streams Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1993 | 1984 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Paul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-Smith | John W. Kingdon |
| Loại≠ | Theory of the policy process | Theory of agenda setting and the policy process |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499 | Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman. ISBN: 9780321121851 |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | ACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition Approach | MSF, Multiple Streams Framework, Kingdon Multiple Streams, Policy Windows Analysis |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them. | The Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) is a theory of agenda setting and policy change developed by John Kingdon in his 1984 book Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. It explains why some issues rise to prominence and some solutions are adopted while others languish, by modelling the policy process as three largely independent 'streams' — problems, policies, and politics — that flow through the system. Change becomes possible when these streams are joined together at a fleeting 'policy window', often through the efforts of a 'policy entrepreneur'. The framework emphasises ambiguity, timing and chance over orderly, rational problem-solving. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|