So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Nghiên cứu hành động× | Đánh giá Chương trình× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Nghiên cứu định tính | Phương pháp thực địa |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1946 | 1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury | Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi |
| Loại≠ | Method | Applied evaluation methodology |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944 |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry | evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation |
| Liên quan≠ | 1 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. | Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|