Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Transect Walk× | Institutional Venn Diagram× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи | 1994 | 1994 |
| Автор методу | Participatory Rural Appraisal tradition (Robert Chambers and colleagues) | Participatory Rural Appraisal tradition (Robert Chambers and colleagues) |
| Тип≠ | Systematic observational walk along a line across a community with local informants | Participatory diagram of local institutions sized and positioned by importance and closeness |
| Основоположне джерело | Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. DOI ↗ | Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви | Transect Diagram, Walking Transect, Transect Survey, Cross-Section Walk | Chapati Diagram, Institutional Relationship Diagram, Venn Diagramming, Organizational Mapping |
| Пов'язані | 4 | 4 |
| Підсумок≠ | A transect walk is a participatory rural appraisal tool in which researchers and local informants walk together along a deliberately chosen line that cuts across the main land-use zones of a community, systematically observing and recording what they see. As they move from, say, riverbank to fields to settlement to hillside, they note soils, vegetation, crops, water, livestock, infrastructure, and the problems and opportunities of each zone. The walk culminates in a transect diagram — a cross-sectional sketch that summarizes how resources and constraints change along the route. | An institutional Venn diagram, often called a chapati or relationship diagram, is a participatory rural appraisal tool in which community members represent the organizations and institutions in their lives as circles and arrange them to show importance and relationships. The size of each circle reflects how important or influential the institution is, and its position — how far from the community and how much it overlaps with other circles — shows how close and how connected it is. The finished diagram is a community-drawn map of its institutional landscape and the social distance between people and the bodies that affect them. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|