Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Transect Walk× | Matrix Scoring and Ranking× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи | 1994 | 1994 |
| Автор методу | Participatory Rural Appraisal tradition (Robert Chambers and colleagues) | Participatory Rural Appraisal tradition (Robert Chambers and colleagues) |
| Тип≠ | Systematic observational walk along a line across a community with local informants | Participatory scoring of options against locally generated criteria in a matrix |
| Основоположне джерело | Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. DOI ↗ | Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви | Transect Diagram, Walking Transect, Transect Survey, Cross-Section Walk | Matrix Scoring, Preference Matrix, Pairwise and Matrix Ranking, Criteria Scoring Matrix |
| Пов'язані | 4 | 4 |
| Підсумок≠ | A transect walk is a participatory rural appraisal tool in which researchers and local informants walk together along a deliberately chosen line that cuts across the main land-use zones of a community, systematically observing and recording what they see. As they move from, say, riverbank to fields to settlement to hillside, they note soils, vegetation, crops, water, livestock, infrastructure, and the problems and opportunities of each zone. The walk culminates in a transect diagram — a cross-sectional sketch that summarizes how resources and constraints change along the route. | Matrix scoring and ranking is a participatory rural appraisal tool in which community members evaluate a set of options — crop varieties, services, trees, livestock breeds, sources of water — against criteria they themselves generate, arranged as a matrix. Options run along one axis and criteria along the other, and participants score each cell, typically by placing a number of counters such as seeds or stones to show how well an option performs on that criterion. Summing the scores across criteria produces a ranking of the options that reflects the community's own values and priorities. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|