Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Надійна номологічна валідність× | Валідність конструкту× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Психометрія | Психометрія |
| Родина | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Рік появи | 1955 | 1955 |
| Автор методу≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Тип≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Validity evaluation framework |
| Основоположне джерело | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Пов'язані≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Підсумок≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|