ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

RMI: Індекс мобільності Рівермід×MSFC: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite×
ГалузьНеврологіяНеврологія
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи19911999
Автор методуFrank Collen, Derick Wade, and Rivermead Rehabilitation CentreGary Cutter, Richard Rudick, and NMSS Consortium
ТипClinician-observed performance testClinician-administered performance test
Основоположне джерелоCollen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G. F., Bradshaw, C. M. (1991). The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. International Disability Studies, 13(2), 50-54. DOI ↗Cutter, G. R., Baier, M. L., Rudick, R. A., et al. (1999). Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Multiple Sclerosis, 5(4), 244-250. DOI ↗
Інші назвиRivermead Mobility IndexMS Functional Composite
Пов'язані54
ПідсумокThe Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) is a brief, clinician-observed performance test of basic mobility abilities developed for assessing stroke and neurological rehabilitation outcomes. Published in 1991 by Frank Collen and colleagues at Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre (Oxford, UK), the 15-item index measures bed mobility, sitting/standing balance, transfers, and ambulation. The RMI is widely used in stroke units and rehabilitation settings to track functional recovery and predict discharge outcomes.The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is an objective, performance-based assessment of MS-related disability capturing three key functional domains: lower extremity mobility, upper extremity coordination, and cognitive/processing speed. Developed in 1999 by the National MS Society and adopted widely in clinical trials, the MSFC provides quantifiable endpoints complementing the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The three-component design addresses EDSS limitations by including cognition and standardizing measurement via timed tasks.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 1 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: RMI · MSFC. Отримано 2026-06-18 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare