Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Якісно-домінуючий прагматичний змішаний метод× | Трансформативний дизайн змішаних методів× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Дизайн дослідження | Дизайн дослідження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1990s–2010s | 2003–2009 |
| Автор методу≠ | David L. Morgan; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Тип | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Sage. ISBN: 978-1452204949 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Інші назви | QUAL-dominant pragmatic MMR, qualitative-priority pragmatic mixed methods, qual-dominant pragmatic design, QUAL+quan pragmatic | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| Пов'язані | 6 | 6 |
| Підсумок≠ | Qualitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which a qualitative strand carries the primary weight of the inquiry, while a smaller quantitative component adds breadth or corroboration. Grounded in pragmatism as its philosophical framework, the design treats questions of data type, sequence, and integration as practical choices driven by the research problem rather than by methodological ideology. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|