Порівняння методів

	Матриця змішаних методів з домінуванням якісного компонента	Конкурентний тріангуляційний змішаний дизайн
Галузь	Дизайн дослідження	Дизайн дослідження
Родина	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Рік появи	2003–2009	2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.)
Автор методу	Charles Teddlie & Abbas Tashakkori (matrix framework); qualitative-dominant weighting drawn from Jennifer Greene and David Morgan	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Тип	Mixed methods research design variant	Mixed methods research design
Основоположне джерело	Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179
Інші назви	QUAL-dominant MMM, qualitative-priority mixed methods matrix, QUAL-weighted matrix design, qual-dominant typology matrix	convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation
Пов'язані	5	5
Підсумок	The qualitative-dominant mixed methods matrix is a design variant in which the researcher selects and positions a specific mixed methods design within a typological matrix — organized by timing (sequential vs. concurrent) and paradigm weighting — while assigning greater priority to the qualitative strand. Quantitative data play a supporting, supplementary role, and the final inferences are grounded primarily in qualitative findings.	The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions.