ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Оцінка прагматичного скринінгового тесту×Поперечне епідеміологічне дослідження×
ГалузьЕпідеміологіяЕпідеміологія
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи2000s-2010s (formalized with PRECIS framework)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
Автор методуPragmatic trial framework: Schwartz & Lellouch (1967); PRECIS tool: Thorpe et al. (2009)Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
ТипObservational / quasi-experimental evaluation designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
Основоположне джерелоThorpe, K. E., Zwarenstein, M., Oxman, A. D., Treweek, S., Furberg, C. D., Altman, D. G., & Chalkidou, K. (2009). A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(5), 464-475. DOI ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
Інші назвиpragmatic diagnostic screen evaluation, real-world screening evaluation, effectiveness-oriented screening study, PRECIS-guided screening evaluationprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
Пов'язані56
ПідсумокA pragmatic screening test evaluation assesses the real-world effectiveness of a screening instrument under routine clinical or public-health conditions — rather than the tightly controlled, ideal-participant settings of explanatory studies. It asks whether the screening tool performs adequately in the actual populations and workflows where it will be deployed, prioritising external validity and implementation relevance over maximally controlled internal conditions.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Pragmatic Screening Test Evaluation · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. Отримано 2026-06-18 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare