ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Прагматичне вкладене дослідження випадок-контроль×Прагматичне рандомізоване контрольоване дослідження×
ГалузьЕпідеміологіяЕпідеміологія
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи1977 (nested case-control); pragmatic variant emerged in real-world evidence research from 1990s onwards1967
Автор методуDuncan Thomas (nested case-control); pragmatic design concept from Schwartz & Lellouch (1967)Daniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch
ТипObservational epidemiological study designInterventional study design
Основоположне джерелоThomas, D. C. (1977). Addendum to: Methods of cohort analysis: Appraisal by application to asbestos mining. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 140(4), 469–491. link ↗Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗
Інші назвиreal-world nested case-control, pragmatic NCC, nested case-control in routine data, real-world evidence nested case-controlpragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trial
Пов'язані56
ПідсумокA pragmatic nested case-control study embeds a case-control analysis within a pre-existing real-world cohort — typically drawn from electronic health records, administrative claims, or disease registries — to examine associations between exposures and outcomes under routine clinical conditions. Controls are sampled from the risk set (those still at risk at the time each case occurs), preserving temporal sequence while dramatically reducing data-collection costs compared with a full cohort analysis.A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Pragmatic nested case-control · Pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Отримано 2026-06-18 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare