ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Шкала політичної дієвості×Шкала політичної довіри×Шкала цинізму виборців×
ГалузьПолітична психологіяПолітична психологіяПолітична психологія
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи196919741960
Автор методуRichard Niemi, Steven Craig, Albert BanduraArthur H. MillerAngus Campbell et al.
ТипSelf-reportSelf-reportSelf-report
Основоположне джерелоNiemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407-1413. DOI ↗Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951-972. DOI ↗Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
Інші назвиPolitical Efficacy, Internal Efficacy, External EfficacyPTS, Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Trust ModulePCS, Political Efficacy Cynicism, Electoral System Cynicism
Пов'язані333
ПідсумокPolitical efficacy measures sense of personal agency and power in the political system, encompassing both internal efficacy (belief in own political competence and understanding) and external efficacy (belief that the political system is responsive to citizen input). Rooted in Bandura's self-efficacy theory (1977) and developed for political contexts by Niemi, Craig, and colleagues (1969 onwards), the measure explains why some citizens feel empowered to engage in politics while others feel powerless. High-efficacy citizens are substantially more likely to participate, contact representatives, and vote; low-efficacy citizens withdraw from politics and are susceptible to anti-democratic appeals.The Political Trust Scale measures citizen confidence in government institutions, elected officials, and the political system's responsiveness and fairness. Pioneered by Miller (1974) and operationalized across comparative electoral studies (CSES Module 5), the scale captures both diffuse trust (in the political system generally) and specific trust (in particular institutions such as parliament or the executive). It is central to understanding democratic legitimacy, political engagement, and support for democratic institutions.The Voter Cynicism Scale measures citizen skepticism and disillusionment regarding the political process, including beliefs that the electoral system is rigged, politicians are self-serving, and voting does not matter. The measure captures a pessimistic orientation toward electoral democracy distinct from distrust in institutions (which can coexist with belief in democratic potential) or political alienation. Rooted in Campbell et al.'s American Voter (1960) tradition of measuring political efficacy and cynicism, the scale remains central to understanding voter turnout decline, support for populist alternatives, and democratic legitimacy crises.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 3 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Political Efficacy Scale · Political Trust Scale · Voter Cynicism Scale. Отримано 2026-06-20 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare