ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Метод синтетичного контролю для оцінки політики×Зіставлення за показником схильності×
ГалузьПричинно-наслідковий висновокСтатистика досліджень
РодинаRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Рік появи2003-20101983
Автор методуAlberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal; extended by Abadie, Diamond & HainmuellerPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ТипCausal inference / comparative case studyMethod
Основоположне джерелоAbadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Інші назвиSynthetic Control Method, SCM, Synthetic Control, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller methodPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Пов'язані53
ПідсумокThe Synthetic Control Method (SCM) is a causal inference technique for evaluating the effect of a policy or intervention on a single treated unit — such as a region, country, or firm — by constructing a weighted combination of untreated comparison units that closely mirrors the treated unit before the intervention. Introduced by Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003) and formalized by Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller (2010), it provides a data-driven, transparent counterfactual for comparative case studies.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Policy Evaluation Synthetic Control Method · Propensity Score Matching. Отримано 2026-06-18 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare