Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Усна історія× | Дискурс-аналіз× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь≠ | Якісні методи | Якісні дослідження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Автор методу≠ | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Інші назви≠ | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Пов'язані≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Підсумок≠ | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|