Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Інструмент оцінки музичної терапії× | Шкала ставлень до комплементарної та альтернативної медицини× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Інтегративна медицина | Інтегративна медицина |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 2008 | 2003 |
| Автор методу≠ | Hanson, B.; Clark, M.; Plante, W. | Hough, H. J.; Darcey, V. L.; Scofield, R. F. |
| Тип≠ | Multi-method: client self-report, clinician observation, behavioral coding | Self-report scale |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Thaut, M. H. (2005). Rhythm, music, and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. New York: Routledge. link ↗ | Hough, H. J., Darcey, V. L., & Scofield, R. F. (2003). Attitudes toward alternative/complementary medicines among pharmacy students, faculty, and preceptors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 85. link ↗ |
| Інші назви≠ | MTAT, Music Therapy Outcome Measures | ACAMS |
| Пов'язані | 4 | 4 |
| Підсумок≠ | The MTAT is a comprehensive assessment instrument for measuring client outcomes and music therapist competency in music therapy. Developed by Hanson and colleagues, it operationalizes music therapy impact across emotional, social, behavioral, and physiological domains, suitable for diverse populations including psychiatric, pediatric, geriatric, and neurological populations. | The ACAMS is a self-report instrument measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Developed in the early 2000s, it assesses openness, acceptance, and perceived legitimacy of CAM alongside conventional medicine, helping identify educational gaps and organizational readiness for integrative practice. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|