ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Мультицентрова оцінка скринінгового тесту×Поперечне епідеміологічне дослідження×
ГалузьЕпідеміологіяЕпідеміологія
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи1976–2003 (core diagnostic accuracy framework; multicenter STARD standards formalized 2003)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
Автор методуMethodological consensus (STARD group, Bossuyt et al.); broader diagnostic accuracy tradition rooted in Hanley & McNeil (1982) and Sackett & Haynes (1976)Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
ТипObservational diagnostic accuracy studyObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
Основоположне джерелоBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40-44. DOI ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
Інші назвиmulticenter diagnostic accuracy study, multisite screening evaluation, multicenter test performance study, multicenter DTA studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
Пов'язані66
ПідсумокA multicenter screening test evaluation measures the diagnostic accuracy of a screening test — its sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and ROC-curve area — by enrolling participants across two or more independent clinical sites. Conducting the study at multiple centers broadens the patient spectrum, tests generalizability across different laboratory conditions and patient populations, and produces more externally valid accuracy estimates than a single-center study.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Multicenter Screening Test Evaluation · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. Отримано 2026-06-17 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare