Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Багатогруповий аналіз елементів× | Багаторівневий конфірматорний факторний аналіз (MG-CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Психометрія | Психометрія |
| Родина | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Рік появи≠ | 1986 | 1971 |
| Автор методу≠ | Classical test theory tradition; systematised by Crocker & Algina (1986) | Karl Jöreskog |
| Тип≠ | Comparative item-level analysis | Measurement model / invariance test |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030616341 | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви | MGIA, group-comparative item analysis, subgroup item analysis, cross-group item analysis | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| Пов'язані | 6 | 6 |
| Підсумок≠ | Multi-group item analysis computes classical item statistics — difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correlations — separately for each subgroup in a sample and then compares those statistics across groups. It is a standard diagnostic step in scale development and test fairness evaluation, revealing items that behave differently for men versus women, across age cohorts, or across cultural groups before more formal DIF testing. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|