Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Змішане мета-виведення× | Конкурентний тріангуляційний змішаний дизайн× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Дизайн дослідження | Дизайн дослідження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1998–2003 | 2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.) |
| Автор методу≠ | Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Тип≠ | Mixed methods integration procedure | Mixed methods research design |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| Інші назви | meta-inference, mixed methods overall inference, integrated inference, MMR meta-inference | convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation |
| Пов'язані≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Підсумок≠ | Mixed methods meta-inference is the overarching conclusion drawn at the end of a mixed methods study by systematically combining and integrating the separate inferences produced by the quantitative and qualitative strands. It represents the highest-level interpretive act in mixed methods research: moving beyond strand-specific findings to produce a unified, coherent understanding of the research problem that neither strand could yield alone. | The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|