Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Стратифікована регресія Кокса для парних даних× | Аналіз Каплана-Майєра× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Епідеміологія | Епідеміологія |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1972 (Cox model); matched extension widely adopted 1970s–1980s | 1958 |
| Автор методу≠ | D. R. Cox (Cox model, 1972); stratification extension for matched designs by subsequent methodologists including D. C. Thomas | Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier |
| Тип≠ | Semi-parametric survival regression for matched data | Nonparametric survival estimator |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗ | Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви | stratified Cox regression, conditional Cox model, matched survival analysis, Cox model for matched pairs | KM analysis, KM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve |
| Пов'язані≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Підсумок≠ | Matched Cox proportional hazards is a survival analysis method that extends the Cox regression model to appropriately handle data arising from matched study designs — matched cohorts or matched case-control studies with time-to-event outcomes. By stratifying the partial likelihood by matched set, the method eliminates confounding from matching factors without estimating their baseline hazard, yielding valid hazard ratio estimates that are free from matching-induced bias. | Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function from time-to-event data. Introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, it produces the classic step-function survival curve that shows the probability of surviving beyond each observed event time, correctly accounting for censored observations — participants who left the study or had not yet experienced the event by the end of follow-up. It is one of the most widely used techniques in clinical and epidemiological research. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|