Порівняння методів

	Інтерпретативне якісне контент-аналізне дослідження	Інтерпретативне дискурс-аналіз
Галузь	Якісні методи	Якісні методи
Родина	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Рік появи	2005 (interpretive strand formalised); qualitative content analysis roots in the 1980s–1990s	1980s–1990s
Автор методу	Hsiu-Fang Hsieh & Sarah E. Shannon (conventional/interpretive strand); Phillip Mayring (qualitative content analysis generally)	Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others
Тип	Qualitative analytic approach	Qualitative interpretive research approach
Основоположне джерело	Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.	Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343
Інші назви	conventional content analysis, inductive qualitative content analysis, interpretive QCA, IQCA	IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis
Пов'язані	5	6
Підсумок	Interpretive qualitative content analysis (also called conventional content analysis) is a qualitative approach to systematically analysing text in which coding categories emerge directly from the data rather than from a pre-defined coding scheme. The researcher immerses themselves in the material, derives codes inductively through close reading, groups those codes into interpretive categories, and constructs a conceptual account of the content's meaning. It is especially suited to domains where existing theory is sparse and the aim is to understand how participants describe or make sense of a phenomenon.	Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds.