Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Інтерпретативна інституційна етнографія× | Дискурс-аналіз× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь≠ | Якісні методи | Якісні дослідження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1987 (IE); interpretive variant consolidated 1990s–2000s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Автор методу≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (institutional ethnography); interpretive elaboration by Campbell, Gregor, and others | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Smith, D. E. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Northeastern University Press. ISBN: 978-1555530167 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Інші назви≠ | interpretive IE, hermeneutic institutional ethnography, meaning-centered institutional ethnography, IIE | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Пов'язані≠ | 5 | 2 |
| Підсумок≠ | Interpretive institutional ethnography (IIE) is a qualitative research design that combines Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography — which maps how institutional texts and social relations coordinate everyday life — with an explicitly interpretive, meaning-centered stance. Rather than stopping at describing ruling relations, the researcher asks what those relations mean to people embedded in them and how participants actively interpret institutional demands and texts in their lived experience. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|