Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Фокулдіанський аналіз дискурсу× | Дискурс-аналіз× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь≠ | Якісні методи | Якісні дослідження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1960s–1970s (The Order of Things 1966; The Archaeology of Knowledge 1969; Discipline and Punish 1975) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Автор методу≠ | Michel Foucault | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Інші назви≠ | FDA, Foucauldian analysis, genealogical discourse analysis, archaeological discourse analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Пов'язані≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Підсумок≠ | Foucauldian Discourse Analysis (FDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language, texts, and social practices produce knowledge, construct subjects, and exercise power. Drawing on Michel Foucault's archaeological and genealogical frameworks, FDA investigates the historical and institutional conditions that make certain statements possible, acceptable, and 'true' while silencing others. It is widely applied in critical social science, health, education, and policy research to expose how dominant discourses shape what can be said, known, and done within a given social field. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|