Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Зручна вибірка у польових умовах× | Снігова вибірка× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Методологія опитувань | Методологія опитувань |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | Mid-20th century onward | 1961 |
| Автор методу≠ | Conventional practice in social and epidemiological field research | Leo A. Goodman |
| Тип≠ | Non-probability sampling | Non-probability sampling technique |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-0495598428 | Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви | intercept sampling, on-site convenience sampling, street intercept sampling, field intercept survey | chain-referral sampling, network sampling, respondent-driven sampling, referral sampling |
| Пов'язані≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Підсумок≠ | Field-based convenience sampling is a non-probability technique in which researchers recruit participants by approaching whoever is physically present and accessible at a chosen real-world location — a market, hospital waiting room, park, or transit hub. It is widely used in public health surveillance, marketing research, and exploratory social surveys when rapid, low-cost data collection is needed and probability sampling is not feasible. | Snowball sampling is a non-probability recruitment technique in which initial participants (seeds) refer the researcher to others who meet the study criteria, and those referrals in turn refer further participants. The sample grows incrementally — like a rolling snowball — until the required size or theoretical saturation is reached. It is the method of choice when a target population has no accessible sampling frame, such as undocumented migrants, illicit drug users, survivors of stigmatised experiences, or members of closed professional networks. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|