ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Щоденник польових досліджень віч-на-віч×Метод щоденника з особистим контактом×
ГалузьМетодологія опитуваньМетодологія опитувань
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи1981–1989 (systematic articulation in qualitative fieldwork literature)1980s–1990s (formalized face-to-face protocol era)
Автор методуRobert G. Burgess (systematic research diary in fieldwork); Mary Louise Holly (professional journal writing)Rooted in sociological and psychological diary research traditions; face-to-face protocols formalized in the late 20th century
ТипQualitative data collection and reflexivity toolQualitative / mixed-methods data collection technique
Основоположне джерелоHolly, M. L. (1989). Writing to Grow: Keeping a Personal-Professional Journal. Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0435084592Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761941484
Інші назвиin-person research journal, fieldwork reflexive diary, face-to-face researcher journal, in-person reflexive login-person diary study, face-to-face diary study, personal diary method, paper diary method
Пов'язані65
ПідсумокA face-to-face research diary is a systematic reflexive log maintained by the researcher during in-person fieldwork. Unlike participant diaries, this is the researcher's own running record of observations, analytic thoughts, methodological decisions, and emotional responses captured during or immediately after direct, embodied encounters with participants or field settings. It serves simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument within qualitative research.The face-to-face diary method is a data collection technique in which participants are recruited, briefed, and supported through in-person researcher contact while keeping structured or open-ended diaries over a defined period. By combining the temporal depth of diary records with the rapport and clarity of direct researcher interaction, it reduces ambiguity in diary instructions, improves compliance, and allows the researcher to probe or clarify entries at handover or follow-up meetings.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Face-to-face Research Diary · Face-to-face Diary Method. Отримано 2026-06-19 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare