Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Орієнтовані на оцінювання прагматичні змішані методи× | Активне дослідження× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь≠ | Дизайн дослідження | Якісні дослідження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1946 |
| Автор методу≠ | Jennifer C. Greene; Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury |
| Тип≠ | Mixed methods research design | Method |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787984090 | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви≠ | pragmatic evaluation mixed methods, program evaluation mixed methods, applied pragmatic mixed methods, mixed methods program evaluation | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry |
| Пов'язані≠ | 2 | 1 |
| Підсумок≠ | Evaluation-oriented pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that combines quantitative and qualitative data collection within a pragmatist philosophical stance, expressly to evaluate programs, policies, or interventions. Rather than adhering rigidly to a single paradigm, it selects methods for their fitness to answer evaluation questions about program effectiveness, outcomes, and stakeholder experiences. The design is widely applied in education, public health, social services, and development evaluation contexts. | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|