Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Дескриптивна феноменологія× | Дискурс-аналіз× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь≠ | Якісні методи | Якісні дослідження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1970s–1985 (systematised by Giorgi; refined 2009) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Автор методу≠ | Amedeo Giorgi (adapting Edmund Husserl's transcendental phenomenology) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Giorgi, A. (2009). The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Duquesne University Press. ISBN: 978-0820703992 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Інші назви≠ | Giorgi method, empirical phenomenology, scientific phenomenology, Husserlian descriptive phenomenology | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Пов'язані≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Підсумок≠ | Descriptive Phenomenology, systematised by Amedeo Giorgi at Duquesne University, is a rigorous qualitative method for uncovering the general psychological structure of a lived experience. Drawing directly on Husserl's transcendental phenomenology, Giorgi's four-step procedure — epoché, whole reading, meaning-unit discrimination, and transformation into disciplinary language — produces a stable, replicable description of what makes an experience essentially what it is, without theoretical interpretation or causal explanation. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|