ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Democratic Peace Analysis×Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis×
ГалузьInternational RelationsInternational Relations
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи19931996
Автор методуZeev Maoz & Bruce Russett (and the broader democratic-peace literature)Daniel Jones, Stuart Bremer & J. David Singer (Correlates of War project)
ТипObservational dyadic test of the regime-type/conflict relationshipCoding and statistical analysis of interstate militarized confrontations
Основоположне джерелоMaoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. DOI ↗Jones, D. M., Bremer, S. A., & Singer, J. D. (1996). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(2), 163–213. DOI ↗
Інші назвиDemocratic Peace Theory Testing, Dyadic Democratic Peace Analysis, Joint Democracy and Conflict Analysis, Liberal Peace AnalysisMID Analysis, Militarized Dispute Coding, Correlates of War Dispute Analysis, Dyadic Conflict Onset Analysis
Пов'язані33
ПідсумокDemocratic peace analysis is the empirical study of the proposition that democracies rarely or never fight one another. Building on the dyadic research design crystallized by Maoz and Russett (1993), it codes the regime type of each state, constructs dyad-years, and models the probability of militarized conflict as a function of joint democracy alongside controls for power, contiguity, alliances, and trade. The approach has produced one of the most robust empirical regularities in international relations and a long debate over whether shared norms or institutional structures account for it.Militarized interstate dispute (MID) analysis is the coding and quantitative study of confrontations in which one state threatens, displays, or uses military force against another. Built on the Correlates of War project's MID dataset and the coding rules codified by Jones, Bremer, and Singer (1996), it provides the standard observational measure of interstate conflict short of and including war, structured as dyad-years so that the onset, escalation, and outcomes of disputes can be modeled statistically across two centuries of the international system.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 1 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Democratic Peace Analysis · Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis. Отримано 2026-06-25 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare