Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Конфірмаційне дослідження× | Дослідження з перевіркою гіпотез× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Дизайн дослідження | Дизайн дослідження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1934 (Popper); widely adopted in social sciences from 1960s onward | Early 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933) |
| Автор методу≠ | Karl Popper (falsificationism); formalized in behavioral sciences by Paul Meehl and others | Karl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson |
| Тип≠ | Quantitative research design | Quantitative confirmatory research design |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson. ISBN: 978-0415278447 | Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603 |
| Інші назви | hypothesis-testing research, deductive research, theory-testing research, confirmatory study | hypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST design |
| Пов'язані | 4 | 4 |
| Підсумок≠ | Confirmatory research is a deductive quantitative design in which the researcher specifies hypotheses derived from existing theory before data collection, then tests whether the data support or refute those hypotheses. Unlike exploratory approaches that generate ideas from data, confirmatory research begins with an established theoretical framework, pre-registers predictions, and applies statistical tests to evaluate those predictions against empirical evidence. It is the backbone of hypothesis-driven social, behavioral, and health science inquiry. | Hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|