ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Аналіз цитування×Інструменти керування цитуваннями×Система ідентифікаторів цифрових об'єктів×
ГалузьДослідницькі навичкиДослідницькі навичкиДослідницькі навички
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи1955 (citation indexes); 1975 (Impact Factor); 2005 (H-index)2001 (modern era, EndNoteWeb); 2006 (Mendeley); 2006 (Zotero)1998 (concept); 2001 (widespread adoption)
Автор методуEugene Garfield (Citation Indexes, 1955); Jorge Hirsch (H-index, 2005)Academic researchers and librarians; developed since 1980sNorman Paskin, CrossRef and International DOI Foundation (1998)
ТипToolToolStandard
Основоположне джерелоHirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. DOI ↗Booth, A. (2012). Citation management tools. In R. Bosch & K. Winn (Eds.), Reference management and citation software. Library Technology Reports, 48(5), 12–18. link ↗Paskin, N. (2010). Digital Object Identifier (DOI) system. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3rd ed., 1586–1592. ISBN: 978-0-8493-9712-7
Інші назвиcitation metrics, bibliometric analysis, citation trackingreference manager, citation software, bibliographic managementDOI, Digital Object Identifier, persistent identifier
Пов'язані434
ПідсумокCitation analysis is the systematic study of how scholarly works are cited by subsequent research, used as a proxy for research impact and influence. Founded formally by Eugene Garfield in 1955 (introducing citation indexes), the field encompasses metrics ranging from simple citation counts to sophisticated indices like the H-index (Hirsch, 2005) and field-normalized indicators. Citation analysis is used to evaluate researcher productivity, track influence of ideas, assess journal quality, and detect research trends. While citation counts are not perfect measures of quality (high citation does not equal high quality; time lag in citation accumulation), they provide valuable quantitative data for research evaluation alongside peer review and expert assessment.Citation management tools are software applications that store, organize, and format bibliographic references. They allow researchers to import citations from databases and websites, annotate and tag articles, organize references by project, and automatically generate formatted in-text citations and bibliographies in multiple styles (APA, Vancouver, Chicago, Harvard). Popular tools include Zotero (free, open-source), Mendeley (Elsevier-owned, freemium), EndNote (commercial, Clarivate), and others. These tools are essential for managing the hundreds to thousands of references accumulate during a research career and for ensuring consistent, accurate citation formatting in academic writing.A Digital Object Identifier (DOI) is a unique, persistent alphanumeric code that identifies a scholarly work (journal article, book chapter, dataset, preprint) and persists even if the URL changes. Introduced in 1998 by Norman Paskin and the International DOI Foundation, DOIs are now standard in academic publishing. They consist of a prefix (assigned to a publisher or organization) and a suffix (assigned to an individual work), formatted as 10.XXXX/XXXXX (e.g., 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097). DOIs are registered with international agencies (CrossRef, DataCite, mEDRA) and resolve through the centralized resolver https://doi.org/, ensuring that a DOI will direct users to the correct article regardless of whether the publisher's website changes location.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 3 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Citation Analysis · Citation Management Tools · Digital Object Identifier System. Отримано 2026-06-20 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare