ScholarGate
Asistan

Yöntem Karşılaştırma

Seçtiğiniz yöntemleri yan yana inceleyin; farklı satırlar vurgulanır.

Standardized Clinical Cutoff×Goal Attainment Scaling×Single-System Design×
AlanSocial WorkSocial WorkSocial Work
AileProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Köken yılı199119682009
KökenNeil S. Jacobson & Paula TruaxThomas J. Kiresuk & Robert E. ShermanMartin Bloom, Joel Fischer & John G. Orme (codification in social work)
TürMethod for judging whether individual change on a standardized measure is reliable and clinically meaningfulIndividualized, criterion-referenced outcome measurement procedureTime-series design for evaluating intervention with a single client system
Seminal kaynakJacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI ↗Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, R. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4(6), 443–453. DOI ↗Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066
Diğer adlarClinical Cutoff Score, Clinical Significance Method, Reliable Change Index, Jacobson-Truax MethodGAS, Goal Attainment Scale, Kiresuk-Sherman Goal Attainment Scaling, Individualized Goal ScalingSingle-Subject Design, Single-Case Design, N-of-1 Design, Single-System Evaluation
İlişkili334
ÖzetThe standardized clinical cutoff approach, developed by Jacobson and Truax, judges whether an individual client's change on a standardized measure is both statistically reliable and clinically meaningful. It pairs a Reliable Change Index — which asks whether a pre-to-post change is larger than the measurement error of the instrument — with a cutoff score that marks the boundary between the dysfunctional and functional (normal) populations. A client who moves reliably across that cutoff is counted as recovered, giving practice and research a defensible, individual-level definition of meaningful improvement.Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method for measuring the outcomes of an individualized intervention by writing, in advance, a small set of client-specific goals and defining for each a graded scale of possible outcomes from much worse than expected to much better than expected. After the intervention, the actual outcome on each goal is scored on this scale and the scores are combined into a single standardized index, allowing idiosyncratic, personally meaningful goals to be aggregated and compared across clients and programs. It was introduced by Thomas Kiresuk and Robert Sherman in 1968 to evaluate community mental health programs.A single-system design is a time-series approach to evaluating practice in which a single client system — an individual, family, group, or organization — is measured repeatedly on a clearly defined target before and during (and sometimes after) an intervention. By tracking the same system over time rather than comparing a treatment group to a control group, it lets a practitioner judge whether their own intervention is associated with change in the people they actually serve. It is the methodological backbone of the 'accountable professional' tradition codified by Bloom, Fischer, and Orme.
ScholarGateVeri seti
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kaynaklar
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kaynaklar
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kaynaklar
  3. PUBLISHED

Aramaya git Slaytları indir

ScholarGateYöntem Karşılaştırma: Standardized Clinical Cutoff · Goal Attainment Scaling · Single-System Design. 2026-06-25 tarihinde şu adresten erişildi: https://scholargate.app/tr/compare