ScholarGate
Asistan

Yöntem Karşılaştırma

Seçtiğiniz yöntemleri yan yana inceleyin; farklı satırlar vurgulanır.

Self-Anchored Rating Scale×Single-System Design×
AlanSocial WorkSocial Work
AileProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Köken yılı20092009
KökenCodified in social-work practice evaluation by Bloom, Fischer & OrmeMartin Bloom, Joel Fischer & John G. Orme (codification in social work)
TürIndividualized self-report rating scale with client-defined anchorsTime-series design for evaluating intervention with a single client system
Seminal kaynakBloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066
Diğer adlarSARS, Self-Anchored Scale, Individualized Rating Scale, Client-Anchored ScaleSingle-Subject Design, Single-Case Design, N-of-1 Design, Single-System Evaluation
İlişkili44
ÖzetA self-anchored rating scale (SARS) is an individualized measurement tool in which a client rates a personally relevant target — a feeling, thought, or behavior that may not be captured by any standardized instrument — on a fixed numeric scale whose points the client and worker have anchored in advance with concrete, individually meaningful descriptions. Widely taught in social-work practice evaluation through Bloom, Fischer, and Orme's work, it lets a worker measure highly idiosyncratic internal states repeatedly and reliably, supplying the data for single-system designs when no off-the-shelf scale fits.A single-system design is a time-series approach to evaluating practice in which a single client system — an individual, family, group, or organization — is measured repeatedly on a clearly defined target before and during (and sometimes after) an intervention. By tracking the same system over time rather than comparing a treatment group to a control group, it lets a practitioner judge whether their own intervention is associated with change in the people they actually serve. It is the methodological backbone of the 'accountable professional' tradition codified by Bloom, Fischer, and Orme.
ScholarGateVeri seti
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kaynaklar
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kaynaklar
  3. PUBLISHED

Aramaya git Slaytları indir

ScholarGateYöntem Karşılaştırma: Self-Anchored Rating Scale · Single-System Design. 2026-06-24 tarihinde şu adresten erişildi: https://scholargate.app/tr/compare