Yöntem Karşılaştırma
Seçtiğiniz yöntemleri yan yana inceleyin; farklı satırlar vurgulanır.
| Emotion Appraisal in Politics× | Motivated Reasoning Experiment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Alan | Siyaset psikolojisi | Siyaset psikolojisi |
| Aile | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Köken yılı≠ | 2000 | 2006 |
| Köken≠ | George Marcus, Russell Neuman & Michael MacKuen; Ted Brader | Charles Taber & Milton Lodge |
| Tür | Survey/lab experiment | Survey/lab experiment |
| Seminal kaynak≠ | Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226504698 | Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI ↗ |
| Diğer adlar | Affective Intelligence Experiment, Political Emotion Appraisal Study, Discrete Emotions Politics Measure | Directional Motivated Reasoning Study, Biased Assimilation Experiment, Disconfirmation Bias Paradigm |
| İlişkili | 4 | 4 |
| Özet≠ | Emotion appraisal in politics studies how distinct emotions, anxiety, anger, enthusiasm, and others, arise from cognitive appraisals of political events and in turn shape attention, information seeking, persuasion, and participation. It combines appraisal theory with affective intelligence theory (Marcus, Neuman and MacKuen, 2000) and Brader's (2006) work on emotional campaign appeals, typically measured through experiments and surveys that elicit and analyze discrete emotional responses. | A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure. |
| ScholarGateVeri seti ↗ |
|
|