ScholarGate

Upptäck

Bibliotek Mitt bibliotek Skrivbord Förhandsgranskning Review Studio Assistent

Arbetsyta

Bygg din bokhylla

Spara metoder, ordna samlingar och ta med dem till ditt skrivbord.

Bibliotek

/ Bläddra

Biblioteket

Utforska vetenskapen efter metod, fält och evidens.

En enda katalog över forskningsmetoder — lär dig hur varje metod fungerar, när den ska användas och vad den inte kan göra.

6,496 metoder11 fält7 metodfamiljer40 språk

VetenskapsatlasKartlägg vetenskapens struktur innan du använder den.Fält · metoder · evidensvägarUtforska kartan

FältHealth & Medicine716 Psychology570 Business & Finance410 Engineering330 Life Sciences263 Education261 Research Practice

Ett innehållsdrivet referensbibliotek för forskningsmetoder — vad varje metod är, hur den fungerar och varifrån den kommer.

Öppna data (CC-BY)

Upptäck

Bibliotek
Sök metoder…
Bläddra efter ämnesområde
Ämnesområden
Resa
Jämför
Vilken metod?

Referens

Ämnen
Atlas
Ordlista
Metodik
Filosofi

Arbetsyta

Mitt bibliotek
Skrivbord
Chatt

Företag

Om oss
Priser
Kontakt
Föreslå en metod

Posterna är sammanställda från publicerade källor för referensändamål. Att verifiera att informationen är korrekt och lämplig för din egen användning är ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Ett referensbibliotek för forskningsmetoder

Integritet
Kakor
Villkor
Radera konto

248

Natural Sciences236

Social Sciences185

Environment & Sustainability160

MetodStatistik1,836 AI och ML1,661 Beslutsvetenskap932 Forskningsmetoder1,354 Mätning1,745 Kausalitet & evidens532 Forskningspraktik118

8 metoder inom Law · ForskningsmetoderRensa

Metoder i skärningspunkten mellan dina två filter.

SorteraPopularitet A–Z Z–A Nyast

Case Law Analysis

Case law analysis is a systematic method for examining judicial decisions to identify binding legal rules, evolving doctrines, and interpretive trends. Rooted in the common law tradition of stare decisis, it requires the researcher to locate the ratio decidendi — the binding reasoning — of each decision, distinguish it

Comparative Doctrinal Legal Research

Comparative doctrinal legal research systematically identifies, expounds, and compares the legal rules, principles, and doctrines governing the same problem across two or more jurisdictions. It combines the internal rigour of doctrinal analysis — mapping the authoritative sources of a single legal system — with the ext

Comparative Legal Analysis

Comparative legal analysis is a structured research method that examines how two or more legal systems — whether national, regional, or supranational — address a common legal problem. By placing rules, doctrines, and judicial decisions side by side, researchers identify convergences, divergences, and the underlying soc

Critical Case Law Analysis

Critical case law analysis applies the theoretical tools of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) to the examination of judicial decisions. Rather than accepting legal reasoning at face value, this approach interrogates how courts construct legal arguments, whose interests those arguments serve, and how ideological commitments

Critical Doctrinal Legal Research

Critical doctrinal legal research combines traditional black-letter legal analysis — systematically mapping the rules, principles, and doctrines found in statutes and case law — with the evaluative lens of critical legal theory. Rather than treating legal doctrine as a neutral or self-contained system, it interrogates

Evaluation-focused legal content analysis

Evaluation-focused legal content analysis is a systematic method for examining legal texts — statutes, regulations, court decisions, contracts, or policy documents — with an explicit evaluative purpose: to assess whether and how well legal instruments achieve specified goals, standards, or values. It combines the struc

Legal Content Analysis

Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social

Longitudinal comparative legal analysis

Longitudinal comparative legal analysis examines how legal rules, doctrines, or institutions develop and diverge across two or more legal systems over an extended period. By combining the spatial dimension of comparative law with the temporal dimension of longitudinal research, it captures not just differences between