Metodbevispost

Democratic Peace Analysis

Democratic peace analysis is the empirical study of the proposition that democracies rarely or never fight one another. Building on the dyadic research design crystallized by Maoz and Russett (1993), it codes the regime type of each state, constructs dyad-years, and models the probability of militarized conflict as a function of joint democracy alongside controls for power, contiguity, alliances, and trade. The approach has produced one of the most robust empirical regularities in international relations and a long debate over whether shared norms or institutional structures account for it.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Källpost

Citat kopierade ordagrant från metodens källpost. Ingen verifiering på källnivå härleds från dem.

Empirical Analysis of the Democratic Peace

Taxonomisk metodpost · process-pipeline / international-relations

Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. · DOI 10.2307/2938740

Öppna fullständig metod

Kuraterade påståenden

Påståenden lagrade i bevisloggen, var och en med sin egen bedömning.

Inga kuraterade påståenden ännu

Denna vy hittar inte på en påståendebedömning när loggen saknar en.

Relaterade metoder

Genererade från metodgrafen och visade som maskinföreslagna relationer – inga bevispåståenden härleds.

Taxonomic bucketDyadic Conflict Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMilitarized Interstate Dispute Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPolity Score Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.