Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| Value Chain Analysis for Development× | Stakeholder Analysis for Development× | |
|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde | Development Studies | Development Studies |
| Familj | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 2001 | 1997 |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Raphael Kaplinsky & Mike Morris; Gary Gereffi, John Humphrey & Timothy Sturgeon | Robin Grimble & Kate Wellard; Mark Reed and colleagues |
| Typ≠ | Systemic market and sectoral analysis framework | Analytical method for identifying and characterising actors |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2001). A Handbook for Value Chain Research. Institute of Development Studies / IDRC, Brighton. link ↗ | Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Pro-Poor Value Chain Analysis, Inclusive Value Chain Analysis, Global Value Chain Analysis, Value Chain Development | Stakeholder mapping, Power-interest analysis, Actor analysis, Influence-importance matrix |
| Närliggande | 4 | 4 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | Value Chain Analysis examines the full sequence of activities required to bring a product or service from conception through production to final consumers and beyond, asking who does what, who governs the chain, and how the value created is distributed among participants. In its development and pro-poor variant, codified in Kaplinsky and Morris's IDS handbook and grounded in Gereffi's global-value-chain theory, the method is used to identify how poor producers and workers can capture a larger or more secure share of value through upgrading and inclusion. | Stakeholder analysis in development is a structured method for identifying the actors with a stake in an intervention and characterising their interests, power, and influence, so that programmes can be designed and implemented with a clear view of whom they affect and who can affect them. Drawing on the natural-resource-management tradition of Robin Grimble and Kate Wellard and the methodological typology of Mark Reed and colleagues, it employs tools such as the power-interest grid, the influence-importance matrix, and Venn diagrams to make the social landscape of a project explicit. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|