Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| Spatial Voting Model× | Ideal Point Estimation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde | Political Science | Political Science |
| Familj≠ | MCDM | Latent structure |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 1957 | 2004 |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Harold Hotelling, Duncan Black & Anthony Downs | Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition) |
| Typ≠ | Formal model of electoral and legislative choice | Latent-variable spatial model of binary choice data |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper & Row. ISBN: 9780060417505 | Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Spatial Theory of Voting, Downsian Model, Proximity Voting Model, Median Voter Model | Ideal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points |
| Närliggande | 4 | 4 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | The spatial voting model represents voters and political alternatives as points in a common geometric policy space and assumes that each voter supports the alternative nearest to their own ideal point. Rooted in Hotelling's location theory, Duncan Black's 1948 single-peakedness result, and Anthony Downs's 1957 economic theory of democracy, the model yields two foundational results: the median voter theorem, which identifies the equilibrium policy in one dimension, and the Downsian prediction that two vote-seeking parties converge toward the center. It is the workhorse formalism behind modern empirical estimation of political positions. | Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|