ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Prospektiv konkurrerande riskanalys×Kaplan-Meier-analys×
ÄmnesområdeEpidemiologiEpidemiologi
FamiljProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ursprungsår1978–1999 (foundational frameworks; prospective application standard by 2000s)1958
UpphovspersonFine & Gray (subdistribution hazard model, 1999); Prentice, Kalbfleisch et al. (cause-specific hazard, 1978)Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier
TypObservational analytic study with event-time statistical analysisNonparametric survival estimator
UrsprungskällaFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗
Aliasprospective CRA, prospective subdistribution hazard analysis, prospective cause-specific hazard analysis, forward-looking competing events analysisKM analysis, KM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve
Närliggande45
SammanfattningProspective competing risks analysis is an observational study design that follows participants forward in time from a well-defined starting point, recording all events — including those that prevent the primary event from occurring — and then estimates cause-specific incidence while correctly accounting for competing outcomes. It combines the temporal clarity of prospective cohort follow-up with the statistical rigor of competing risks methodology to avoid the overestimation inherent in standard Kaplan-Meier curves when multiple event types are present.Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function from time-to-event data. Introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, it produces the classic step-function survival curve that shows the probability of surviving beyond each observed event time, correctly accounting for censored observations — participants who left the study or had not yet experienced the event by the end of follow-up. It is one of the most widely used techniques in clinical and epidemiological research.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: Prospective Competing Risks Analysis · Kaplan-Meier Analysis. Hämtad 2026-06-17 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare