ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Ordinal konvergent validitet×Testning av mätinvarians×
ÄmnesområdePsykometriPsykometri
FamiljLatent structureLatent structure
Ursprungsår1959 (validity framework); ordinal adaptation 1990s–2000s2000
UpphovspersonPolychoric/tetrachoric correlation tradition (Pearson, 1900s); validity framework formalized by Campbell & Fiske (1959)Vandenberg & Lance
TypValidity assessmentMulti-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure
UrsprungskällaRhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. DOI ↗Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
AliasOCV, convergent validity for ordinal scales, polychoric convergent validity, ordinal AVEFactorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği
Närliggande63
SammanfattningOrdinal convergent validity assesses the degree to which indicators of the same latent construct correlate strongly with each other when those indicators are measured on ordinal (e.g., Likert-type) scales. It adapts standard convergent validity procedures — factor loadings, average variance extracted, and HTMT ratios — to account for the discrete, bounded nature of ordinal response categories using polychoric correlations and ordinal-appropriate estimation methods.Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: Ordinal Convergent Validity · Measurement Invariance. Hämtad 2026-06-19 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare