ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Ny metod för att bestämma objektiva kriterievikter×Kombinerad kompromisslösning×
ÄmnesområdeBeslutsfattandeBeslutsfattande
FamiljMCDMMCDM
Ursprungsår20172019
UpphovspersonBulut, E.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypWeight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
UrsprungskällaBulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
Alias
Närliggande88
SammanfattningNMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 1 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: NMD · COCOSO. Hämtad 2026-06-18 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare