ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Ny metod för att bestämma objektiva kriterievikter×Additiv relationsbedömning×
ÄmnesområdeBeslutsfattandeBeslutsfattande
FamiljMCDMMCDM
Ursprungsår20172010
UpphovspersonBulut, E.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypWeight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
UrsprungskällaBulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Alias
Närliggande88
SammanfattningNMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 1 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: NMD · ARAS. Hämtad 2026-06-18 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare