Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| COPRAS-IN× | Analytic Network Process (ANP med återkoppling och beroenden)× | Best-Worst Method× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde | Beslutsfattande | Beslutsfattande | Beslutsfattande |
| Familj | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 2019 | 1996 | 2015 |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Şahin, R. | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. |
| Typ≠ | Interval Neutrosophic ranking — INN: <[T_L,T_U],[I_L,I_U],[F_L,F_U]> with 0 ≤ T_U+I_U+F_U ≤ 3 | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Şahin, R. (2019). COPRAS Method with Neutrosophic Sets. Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 369, Springer, Cham DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — | — |
| Närliggande≠ | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | N-COPRAS (COPRAS-IN — COPRAS with Interval Neutrosophic Numbers (INN)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Şahin, R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|
|