Jämför metoder

	Flera fallbaserade muntliga historier	Muntlig historia
Ämnesområde	Kvalitativa metoder	Kvalitativa metoder
Familj	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ursprungsår	1970s–1990s (convergence of oral history and case study traditions)	1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology
Upphovsperson	Alessandro Portelli (oral history theory); Robert K. Yin (multiple case logic)	Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork
Typ	Qualitative multi-case research design	Qualitative research method
Ursprungskälla	Portelli, A. (1997). The Battle of Valle Giulia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN: 978-0299153045	Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957
Alias	multi-case oral history, comparative oral history, cross-case oral history, multi-site oral history	life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research
Närliggande	6	6
Sammanfattning	Multiple case-based oral history is a qualitative research design that embeds oral history interviews within a multiple-case framework. Rather than collecting testimonies from a single community or site, the researcher deliberately selects two or more distinct cases — communities, cohorts, organisations, or geographic sites — gathers in-depth oral testimonies within each, and then conducts systematic cross-case comparison to identify both shared and divergent historical experiences.	Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected.