ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Konvergent validitet på flera nivåer×Diskriminant validitet×
ÄmnesområdePsykometriPsykometri
FamiljLatent structureLatent structure
Ursprungsår20051959
UpphovspersonDyer, Hanges & Hall; Chen, Bliese & MathieuDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
TypMeasurement validity evaluationValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
UrsprungskällaDyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J. & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Aliascross-level convergent validity, multilevel measurement validity, between-level convergent validitydiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Närliggande45
SammanfattningMultilevel convergent validity evaluates whether items or scales intended to measure the same construct show coherent, strong associations at each level of a nested data structure — within individuals, within groups, and between groups. It extends classical convergent validity from single-level measurement models into the multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (ML-CFA) framework.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: Multilevel Convergent Validity · Discriminant Validity. Hämtad 2026-06-18 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare